Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus

Xin’an Wang; Aijun Ma

doi:10.1007/s00343-015-4195-6

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus

OriginalPaper | Updated：2023-05-16

- Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus
- Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus
- 海洋湖沼学报（英文） 2015年33卷第4期页码：890-894
- Affiliations：
  
  1. Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences
  2. Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries Ministry of Agriculture
  3. Qingdao Key Laboratory for Marine Fish Breeding and Biotechnology
- Author bio：
- Funds：
  
  Supported by the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System (No. CARS-50-G01) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2012AA10A408-8)
- DOI：10.1007/s00343-015-4195-6
  中图分类号：
- 网络首发：2015-03-18，
  
  纸质出版：2015
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus[J]. 海洋湖沼学报（英文）, 2015,33(4):890-894.

Wang, X., Ma, A. Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus, ., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 33, 890–894 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4195-6
Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus[J]. 海洋湖沼学报（英文）, 2015,33(4):890-894. DOI： 10.1007/s00343-015-4195-6.

Wang, X., Ma, A. Comparison of the morphometric dynamics of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus, ., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 33, 890–894 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4195-6 DOI：

摘要

Abstract

The dynamics of changes in body shape of fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot Scophthalmus maximus

and of the differences in body shape between the two strains

were evaluated from 3 to 27 months of age. The ratios of total length/body length

body width/body length and total length/body width were used as morphometric indices. The two strains exhibited different temporal trends in total length/body length but similar trends in body width/body length and total length/body width. Generally

body width/body length of the two strains increased with time and total length/body width decreased. Thus

the bodies of both fast-growing and slow-growing strains of turbot changed from a narrow to a more rounded shape. However

the ratio total length/body length was generally lower

body width/body length was mostly higher and total length/body width was consistently lower in the fast-growing strain than in the slow-growing strain. Correlation analysis of the three shape ratios with body weight showed that total length/body length and total length/body width were unsuitable

and that width/body length was suitable

for use as a phenotypic marker for selective breeding of turbot for growth in weight.

关键词

Keywords

references

Agrawal A A. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science, 294(5541): 321–326.

Atchley W R, Xu S Z, Vogl C. 1994. Developmental quantitative genetic models of evolutionary change. Development al Genetics, 15(1): 92–103.

Atchley W R, Zhu J. 1997. Developmental quantitative genetics, conditional epigenetic variability and growth in mice. Genetics, 147(2): 765–776.

Blanquer A, Alayse J P, Berrada-Pkhami O et al. 1992. Allozyme variation in turbot (Psetta maxima) and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) (Osteichthyes, Pleuronectoformes, Scophthalmidae) throughout their range in Europe. Journal of Fish Biology, 41(5): 725–736.

Cowley D E, Atchley W R. 1992. Quantitative genetic models for development, epigenetic selection, and phenotypic evolution. Evolution, 46(2): 495–518.

Day T, Pritchard J, Schluter D. 1994. A comparison of two sticklebacks. Evolution, 48(5): 1 723–1 734.

Ellis T, Howell B R, Hayes J. 1997. Morphological differences between wild and hatchery-reared turbot. Journal of Fish Biology, 50(5): 1 124–1 128.

Kerschbaumer M, Postl L, Koch M et al. 2011. Morphological distinctness despite large-scale phenotypic plasticity-analysis of wild and pond-bred juveniles of allopatric populations of Tropheus moorii. Naturwissenschaften, 98(2): 125–134.

Khamis A, Ismail Z, Horan K et al. 2005. Nonlinear growth models for modeling oil palm yield growth. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 1(3): 225–233.

Kuhi H D, Kebreab E, Lopez S et al. 2003. An evaluation of different growth functions for describing the profile of live weight with time (age) in meat and egg strains of chicken. Poultry Science, 82(10): 1 536–1 543.

Ma A J, Chen C, Lei J L et al. 2006. Turbot Scophthalmus maximus: stocking density on growth, pigmentation and feed conversion. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 24(3): 307–312.

Meyer A. 1987. Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony in Cichlasoma managuense (Pisces, Chichlidae) and their implications for speciation in cichlid fishes. Evolution, 41(6): 1 357–1 369.

Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(9): 481–486.

Roush W B, Branton S L. 2005. A comparison of fitting growth models with a genetic algorithm and nonlinear regression. Poult ry Science, 84(3): 494–502.

Ruan X H, Wang W J, Kong J et al. 2011. Isolation and analysis of microsatellites in the genome of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(4): 507–508.

Shi C H, Wu J G, Fan L J et al. 2001. Developmental genetic analysis of brown rice weight under different environmental conditions in indica rice. Acta Botanica Sinica, 43(6): 603–609.

Shi C H, Wu J G, Lou X B et al. 2002. Genetic analysis of transparency and chalkiness area at different filling stages of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Field Crops Research, 76(1): 1–9.

Wang C H, Li S F, Liu Z G et al. 2006. Developmental quantitative genetic analysis of body weight and morphological traits in red common carp, Cyprinus carpio L. Aquaculture, 251(2–4): 219–230.

Wang X A, Ma A J, Huang Z H et al. 2010. Heritability and genetic correlation of survival in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 28(6): 1 200–1 205.

Wang X A, Ma A J, Huang Z H et al. 2014. Developmental differences between female and male groups in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) breeding families. Journal of Fisheries of China, 38(4): 464–469. (in Chinese with English abstract)

West-Eberhard M J. 1989. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and System atics, 20(1): 249–278.

Zhu J. 1995. Analysis of conditional genetic effects and variance components in developmental genetics. Genetics, 141(4): 1 633–1 639.

浏览量

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

Pharmacokinetics and tissue behavior of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin in turbot Scophthalmus maximus at two water temperatures

Morphological comparison between a selected fast-growing strain and the common cultured strain of turbot Scophthalmus maximus

Isolation and characterization of 45 Polymorphie microsatellite loci of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and cross-species amplification

Detection of lymphocystis disease virus in Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus and other marine teleosts from northern China

Effects of waterborne Fe(II) on juvenile turbot Scophthalmus maximus: analysis of respiratory rate, hematology and gill histology