

FOLLOWUS
1. Institute of Oceanology Chinese Academy of Sciences
2. Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves Chinese Academy of Sciences
3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
4. Naval Ocean Analysis and Prediction (NOAP) Laboratory Department of Oceanography Naval Postgraduate School
网络首发:2013-05-08,
纸质出版:2013
Scan QR Code
Geostrophic meridional transport in tropical Northwest Pacific based on Argo profiles[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2013,31(3):656-664.
Zhang, Z., Yuan, D. & Chu, P.C. Geostrophic meridional transport in tropical Northwest Pacific based on Argo profiles., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 31, 656–664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-013-2169-0
Geostrophic meridional transport in tropical Northwest Pacific based on Argo profiles[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2013,31(3):656-664. DOI: 10.1007/s00343-013-2169-0.
Zhang, Z., Yuan, D. & Chu, P.C. Geostrophic meridional transport in tropical Northwest Pacific based on Argo profiles., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 31, 656–664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-013-2169-0 DOI:
Absolute geostrophic currents in the North Pacific Ocean were calculated using P-vector method from newly gridded Argo profiling float data collected during 2004–2009. The meridional volume transport of geostrophic currents differed significantly from the classical Sverdrup balance
with differences of 10×106–20×106m3/s in the interior tropical Northwest Pacific Ocean. Analyses showed that errors of wind stress estimation could not explain all of the differences. The largest differences were found in the areas immediately north and south of the bifurcation latitude of the North Equatorial Current west of the dateline
and in the recirculation area of the Kuroshio and its extension
where nonlinear eddy activities were robust. Comparison of the geostrophic meridional transport and the wind-driven Sverdrup meridional transport in a high-resolution OFES simulation showed that nonlinear effects of the ocean circulation were the most likely reason for the differences. It is therefore suggested that the linear
steady wind-driven dynamics of the Sverdrup theory cannot completely explain the meridional transport of the interior circulation of the tropical Northwest Pacific Ocean.
Böning C W, Döscher R, Isemer H J. 1991. Monthly mean wind stress and Sverdrup transports in the North Atlantic: a comparison of the Hellerman-Rosenstein and Isemer-Hasse Climatologies. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21(2): 221–235.
Chu P C. 1995. P-vector method for determining absolute velocity from hydrographic data. Marine Tech. Soc. J., 29(2): 3–14.
Chu P C. 2000. P-vector spiral and determination of absolute velocities. J. Oceanogr., 56: 591–599.
Chu P C. 2006. P-Vector Inverse Method. Springer. 605pp.
Chu P C, Fan C W, Lozano C J, Kerling J. 1998. An airborne expandable bathythermograph (AXBT) survey of the South China Sea, May 1995. J. Geophys. Res., 103: 21 637–21 652.
Chu P C, Lan J, Fan C W. 2001. Japan Sea circulation and thermohaline structure Part I, Climatology. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31: 244–271.
Foreman R J, Emeis S. 2010. Revisiting the definition of the drag coefficient in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40: 2 325–2 332.
Godfrey J S. 1989. A Sverdrup model of the depth-integrated flow for the world ocean allowing for island circulations. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 45: 89–112.
Hautala S L, Roemmich D H, Schmitz Jr W J. 1994. Is the North Pacific in Sverdrup balance along 24°N? J. Geophys. Res., 99: 16 041–16 052.
Large W G, Pond S. 1981. Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong wind. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11: 324–336.
Leetmaa A, Niiler P, Stommel H. 1977. Does the Sverdrup relation account for the mid-Atlantic circulation? J. Mar. Res., 35: 1–10.
Meyers G. 1980. Do Sverdrup transports account for the Pacific North Equatorial Countercurrent? J. Geophys. Res., 85(2): 1 073–1 075.
Marchuk G I, Sarkisian A J, Kochergin V P. 1973. Calculations of flows in a baroclinic ocean: numerical methods and results. Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 5(1): 89–99.
Qiu B, Joyce T M. 1992. Interannual variability in the mid- and low-latitude western North Pacific. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 22: 1 062–1 079.
Schmitz Jr W J, Thompson J D, Luyten J R. 1992. The Sverdrup circulation for the Atlantic along 24°N. J. Geophys. Res., 97(5): 7 251–7 256.
Sverdrup H U. 1947. Wind-driver currents in a baroclinic ocean; with application to the equatorial current of the eastern Pacific. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 33: 318–326.
Wunsch C. 2011. The decadal mean ocean circulation and Sverdrup balance. J. Mar. Res., 69: 417–434.
Wunsch C, Roemmich D. 1985. Is the North Atlantic in Sverdrup balance? J. Phys. Oceanogr., 15: 1 876–1 880.
0
浏览量
2
Downloads
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构

京公网安备11010802024621