Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling
OriginalPaper|Updated:2023-05-16
|
Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling
Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling
海洋湖沼学报(英文)2013年31卷第1期 页码:169-177
Affiliations:
1. Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Environment Institute of Oceanology Chinese Academy of Sciences
2. School of Resource and Geoscience China University of Mining and Technology
Author bio:
Funds:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41206043, 40930845), the Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Environment of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. MGE2011KG07), the Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZCX2-YW-229), and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2009CB219505)
Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2013,31(1):169-177.
Qian, J., Wu, S. & Cui, R. Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 31, 169–177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-013-2074-6
Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2013,31(1):169-177. DOI: 10.1007/s00343-013-2074-6.
Qian, J., Wu, S. & Cui, R. Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 31, 169–177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-013-2074-6DOI:
Accuracy of the staggered-grid finite-difference method of the acoustic wave equation for marine seismic reflection modeling
摘要
Abstract
Seismic wave modeling is a cornerstone of geophysical data acquisition
processing
and interpretation
for which finite-difference methods are often applied. In this paper
we extend the velocity-pressure formulation of the acoustic wave equation to marine seismic modeling using the staggered-grid finite-difference method. The scheme is developed using a fourth-order spatial and a second-order temporal operator. Then
we define a stability coefficient (SC) and calculate its maximum value under the stability condition. Based on the dispersion relationship
we conduct a detailed dispersion analysis for submarine sediments in terms of the phase and group velocity over a range of angles
stability coefficients
and orders. We also compare the numerical solution with the exact solution for a P-wave line source in a homogeneous submarine model. Additionally
the numerical results determined by a Marmousi2 model with a rugged seafloor indicate that this method is sufficient for modeling complex submarine structures.
关键词
Keywords
references
Alford R M, Kelly K R, Boore D M. 1974. Accuracy of finitedifference modeling of the acoustic wave equation. Geophysics, 39: 834–842.
Alkhalifah T. 1997. An anisotropic Marmousi model. SEP-95: Stanford Exploration Project. p.265–282.
Carcione J M, Herman G C, ten Kroode A P. 2002. Seismic modeling. Geophysics, 67: 1 304–1 325.
Dai N, Vafidis A, Kanasewich E R. 1995. Wave propagation in heterogeneous, porous media: a velocity-stress, finitedifference method. Geophysics, 60: 327–340.
De Hoop A T. 1960. A modification of cagniard’s method for solving seismic pulse problems. Applied Scientific Research Section B, 8: 349–356.
Faria E I, Stoffa P L. 1994. Finite-difference modeling in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics, 59: 282–289.
Haney M M. 2007. Generalization of von Neumann analysis for a model of two discrete half-space: the acoustic case. Geophysics, 72: SM35–46.
Juhlin C. 1995. Finite-difference elastic wave propagation in 2D heterogeneous transversely isotropic media. Geophysics Prospecting, 43: 843–858.
Kelly K R, Ward R W, Treitel S, Alford R M. 1976. Synthetic seismograms: a finite-difference approach. Geophysics, 41: 2–27.
Kneib G, Kerner C. 1993. Accurate and efficient seismic modeling in random media. Geophysics, 51: 54–66.
Levander A R. 1988. Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismic seismograms. Geophysics, 53: 1 425–1 436.
Liu Y, Sen M. 2007. A practical implicit finite-difference method: examples from seismic modeling. J. Geophys. Eng., 6: 231–249.
Martin G S, Wiley R, Marfurt K J. 2006. Marmousi2: an elastic upgrade for Marmousi. The Leading Edge, 25: 156–166.
Masson Y, Pride S, Nihei K. 2006. Finite difference modeling of Biot’s poroelastic equations at seismic frequencies. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111: B10305.
Masson Y J, Pride S R. 2010. Finite-difference modeling of Biot’s poroelastic equations across all frequencies. Geophysics, 75: N33–N41.
Mou Y G, Pei Z L. 2006. Seismic Numerical Modeling for 3D Complex Media. Petroleum Industry Press Beijing, China.
Saenger E H, Gold N, Shapiro S A. 2000. Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finitedifference grid. Wave Motion, 31: 77–92.
Versteeg R. 1994. The Marmousi experience: velocity model determination on a synthetic complex data set. The Leading Edge, 13: 927–936.
Virieux J. 1984. SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 49: 1 933–1 942.
Virieux J. 1986. P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 51: 889–901.
Zhang J F. 1997. Quadrangle-grid velocity-stress finite difference method for elastic wave propagation simulation. Geophysical Journal International, 137: 171–182.
Zhang J F. 1999. Quadrangle-grid velocity-stress finite difference method for poroelastic wave equations. Geophysical Journal International, 139: 171–182.
The trial reading is over, you can activate your VIP account to continue reading.