

FOLLOWUS
1. Institute of Oceanology Chinese Academy of Sciences
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
3. Marine Genetics and Breeding Laboratory Ocean University of China
4. Shantou University
网络首发:2011-09-13,
纸质出版:2012
Scan QR Code
Molecular identification and culture observation on Acrochaete leptochaete (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyta) from China[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2012,30(3):476-484.
Deng, Y., Tang, X., Huang, B. et al. Molecular identification and culture observation on Acrochaete leptochaete (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyta) from China., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 30, 476–484 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-012-1130-y
Molecular identification and culture observation on Acrochaete leptochaete (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyta) from China[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2012,30(3):476-484. DOI: 10.1007/s00343-012-1130-y.
Deng, Y., Tang, X., Huang, B. et al. Molecular identification and culture observation on Acrochaete leptochaete (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyta) from China., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 30, 476–484 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-012-1130-y DOI:
Acrochaete leptochaete (Huber) Nielsen (Chaetophoraceae
Chlorophyta) was isolated from the macroalgae Chaetomorpha collected from intertidal pools in Rongcheng
Shandong
China. 18S rDNA combined with ITS regions were used to ascertain the morphological identification of the isolated material. Based on the unialgal culture
asexual reproduction and growth characteristics of A. leptochaete were investigated over wide ranges of temperature and irradiance. Results revealed that asexual reproduction of A. leptochaete could be realized by biflagellate zoospores. The zoospores germinated directly to give self-replicating generations. Zoospore germination was bipolar. A temperature range from 13–21°C and a lower irradiance of 36 μmol/(m2·s) were most favorable for the growth of A. leptochaete. Thallus organization
an important taxonomic criterion for the genus Acrochaete
was affected markedly by temperature and irradiance. Our results extend the knowledge about the species’ general biology and its morphological plasticity. For classification and identification of a simple microphytic algae like A. leptochaete
which are traditionally placed in the class Chaetophoraceae
we propose that molecular tools associated with culture observations are applied.
Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D. 1990. A basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215: 403–410.
Andersen R A, Brett R W, Potter D, Sexton J P. 1998. Phylogeny of the Eustigmatophyceae based upon 18S rDNA, with emphasis on Nannochloropsis. Protist, 149: 61–74.
Blair S M, Mathieson A C, Cheney D P. 1982. Morphological and electrophoretic investigations of selected species of Chaetomorpha (Chlorophyta, Cladophorales). Phycologia, 21: 164–172.
Blomster J, Maggs C A, Stanhope M J. 1999. Extensive intraspecific morphological variation in Enteromorpha muscoides (Chlorophyta) revealed by molecular analysis. Journal of Phycology, 35: 575–586.
Brodie J, Maggs C A, John D M. 2007. Green Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. British Phycologycal Society, London. p.242.
Burrows E M. 1991. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Volume 2 Chlorophyta. Natural History Museum Publications, London. 238p.
Deng Y Y, Tang X R, Ding L P, Lian S X. 2011. A new record from China of the epiphytic marine algae, Acrochaete leptochaete (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyta) with its primary experimental biology. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 29 (2): 350–355.
Dixon P S. 1970. The Rhodophyta: some aspects of their biology. II. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 8: 307–352.
Ding L P, Huang B X. 2006. The taxonomic study on Order Chaetophorales (Chlorophyta) from Yellow-Bohai Sea of China. Studia Marina Sinica, 47: 176–181. (in Chinese)
Guiry M D, Guiry G M. 2011. Algaebase. World-Wide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Flybase: http://www.algaebase.org (Accessed on July 1, 2011).
Hayden H S, Blomster J, Maggs C A, Silva P C, Stanhope M J, Waaland J R. 2003. Linnaeus was right all along: Ulva and Enteromorpha are not distinct genera. European Journal of Phycology, 38: 277–294.
Hayden H S, Waaland J R. 2002. Phylogenetic systematic of the Ulvaceae (Ulvales, Ulvophyceae) using chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence. Phycologia, 38: 1 200–1 212.
Hoek C van den. 1963. Revision of the European Species of Cladophora. E. J. Brill, Leiden. 248p.
Huber J. 1892. Contributions à la connaissance des Chaetophorées epiphytes et endophytes et de leurs affinités. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, sér, 16: 265–359.
Johnson L R, John D M. 1992. Taxonomic observations on some uncommon and new Gongrosira species (Chaetophorales sensu stricto, Division Chlorophyta). British Phycological Journal, 27: 153–163.
Kornmann P. 1972. Ein beitrag zur taxonomie der gattung Chaetomorpha (Cladophorales, Chlorophyta). Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 23: 1–31.
Lee M S Y. 2004. The molecularisation of taxonomy. Invertebrate Systematics, 1: 1–6.
Mathieson A C, Norton T A, Neushul M. 1981. The taxonomic implications of genetic and environmentally induced variations in seaweed morphology. The Botanical Review, 47: 313–347.
Nielsen R. 1972. A study of the shell-boring marine algae around the Danish Island Læsø. Botanisk Tidsskrift, 67: 245–269.
Nielsen R. 1979. Culture studies on the type species of Acrochaete, Bolbocoleon and Entocladia (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyceae). Bot. Notiser, 132: 441–449.
Nielsen R. 1983. Culture studies of Acrochaete leptochaete comb. nov. and A. wittrockii comb. nov. (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyceae). Nordic Journal of Botany, 3: 689–694.
O’Kelly C J, Yarish C. 1981. Observations on marine Chaetophoraceae (Chlorophyta). II. On the circumscription of the genus Entocladia Reinke. Phycologia, 20: 32–45.
O’Kelly C J, Wysor B, Bellows W K. 2004. Collinsiella (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) and other ulotrichalean taxa with shellboring sporophytes form a monophyletic clade. Phycologia, 43 (1): 41–49.
Patel R. 1971. Growth of members of Cladophorales in experimental culture. Phykos, 10: 40–53.
Price W M. 1967. Some aspects of the biology and taxonomy of the unbranched Cladophorales in the British Islands. Thesis, University of Liverpool. p.107.
Pringsheim N. 1863. Beitrhäge zur Morphologie der Meeresalgen. Norsk Phys. Abh. Akad. Wiss. Berl in, 1 862: 1–38.
Swofford D L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), 4.0 edn, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
South G R. 1968. Aspects of the development and reproduction of Acrochaete repens and Bolbocoleon piliferum. Canadian Journal of Botany, 46: 101–113.
Thompson J D, Gibson T J, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D G. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X Windows Interface: Flexible Strategies for Multiple Sequence Alignment Aided by Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 25: 4 876–4 882.
Uilenberg G, Thiaucourt F, Jongejan F. 2004. On molecular taxonomy: what is in a name? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 32: 301–312.
Wilkinson M, Burrows E M. 1972. An experimental taxonomic study of the algae confused under the name Gomontia polyrhiza. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK, 52: 49–57.
Yarish C. 1975. A cultural assessment of the taxonomic criteria of selected marine Chaetophoraceae (Chlorophyta). Nova Hedwigia, 26: 385–430.
Yarish C. 1976. Polymorphism of selected marine Chaetophoraceae (Chlorophyta). British Phycological Journal, 11: 29–38.
0
浏览量
3
Downloads
6
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构

京公网安备11010802024621