Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery

M. Saeed Heydarnejad; G. J. Purser

doi:10.1007/s00343-010-9935-z

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery

OriginalPaper | Updated：2023-05-16

- Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery
- Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery
- 海洋湖沼学报（英文） 2010年28卷第4期页码：749-755
- Affiliations：
  
  1. Aquaculture Sector Biology Dept. Faculty of Science Shahrekord Uni
  2. School of Aquaculture Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute University of Tasmania
- Author bio：
- Funds：
- DOI：10.1007/s00343-010-9935-z
  中图分类号：
- 网络首发：2010-06-29，
  
  纸质出版：2010
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery[J]. 海洋湖沼学报（英文）, 2010,28(4):749-755.

Saeed Heydarnejad, M., Purser, G.J. Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 28, 749–755 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-010-9935-z
Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery[J]. 海洋湖沼学报（英文）, 2010,28(4):749-755. DOI： 10.1007/s00343-010-9935-z.

Saeed Heydarnejad, M., Purser, G.J. Behaviour of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under defensible and indefensible patterns of food delivery., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 28, 749–755 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-010-9935-z DOI：

摘要

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the behaviour of rainbow trout (n=30)

Oncorhynchus mykiss

in small raceways when either self-feeders (T2) or hand-feeding (t2) were used. The method of food delivery in T2 was defensible while that of t2 was indefensible. Fish in both raceways were subjected to restricted feeding (RF) for 25 days. Food was available in the morning (09:00–10:00) in the downstream area and in the afternoon (16:00–17:00) in the upstream area of the raceways. The results showed that the behaviour of rainbow trout was significantly different under interference competition (T2) for food compared with that under scramble competition (t2). RF in T2 fish limited food availability to meal times when feeding rewards were available while t2 fish only responded to the location of food delivery. The aggressive fish in T2 were dominant

and t2 fish at high densities showed intense social interactions under the indefensible pattern of food distribution; these interactions did not dampen to a minimum level to suppress the development of dominance hierarchies. Further

the stocking density did not break down the dominance hierarchies between the T2 fish. This suggests that decreased efficiency in the search for food or inefficient foraging

induced by interference competition at high densities

affected the behaviour of rainbow trout.

关键词

Keywords

references

Alanärä A. 1992. The effect of time-restricted demand feeding on feeding activity, growth and feed conversion in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture, 108: 357–368.

Alanärä A. 1996. The use of self-feeders in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) production. Aquaculture, 145: 1–20.

Alanärä A, Brännäs E. 1996. Dominance in demand-feeding behaviour in Arctic char and rainbow trout: the effect of stocking density. Journal of Fish Biology, 48: 242–254.

Alanärä A, Kadri S, Paspatis M. 2001. Feeding management. In: Houlihan D, Boujard T, Jobling M eds. Food Intake in Fish. Blackwell Science Ltd., London, pp. 332–353.

Bolliet V, Aranda A, Boujard T. 2001. Demand-feeding rhythm in rainbow trout and European catfish: synchronisation by photoperiod and food availability. Physiology and Behaviour, 73: 625–633.

Brännäs E, Alanärä A. 1992. Feeding behaviour of the Arctic char in comparison with the rainbow trout. Aquaculture, 105: 53–59.

Brännäs E, Alanärä A. 1993. Monitoring the feeding activity of individual fish with a demand feeding system. Journal of Fish Biology, 42: 209–215.

Brännäs E, Alanärä A. 1994. Effect of reward level on individual variability in demand feeding activity and growth rate in Arctic char and rainbow trout. Journal of Fish Biology, 45: 423–434.

Brännäs E, Berglund U, Eriksson L O. 2005. Time learning and anticipatory activity in groups of Arctic charr. Ethology, 111; 681–692.

Chen W M, Naruse M, Tabata M. 2002. Circadian rhythms and individual variability of self-feeding activity in groups of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum. Aquaculture Research, 33: 491–500.

Cuenca E M, de la Higuera M. 1994. Evidence for an endogenous circadian rhythm of feeding in the trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Biological Rhythm Research, 25: 228–235.

Davis M W, Olla B L. 1987. Aggression and variation in growth of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) juveniles in seawater: effects of limited rations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44: 192–197.

Grant J W A. 1993. Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. Marine Behavioural Physiology, 23: 137–153.

Jobling M, Arnesen A M, Baardvik B M, Christiansen J S, Jorgensen E H. 1995. Monitoring feeding behaviour and food intake: methods and applications. Aquaculture Nutrition, 1: 131–143.

Kadri S, Huntingford F A, Metcalfe N B, Thorpe J E. 1991. Daily feeding rhythms of Atlantic salmon in sea cages. Aquaculture, 92: 219–224.

Landless P J. 1976. Demand-feeding behaviour of rainbow trout. Aquaculture, 7: 11–26.

Noakes D L, Grant J W A. 1992. Feeding and social behaviour of brook and lake char. In: Thorpe J E, Huntingford F A eds. The importance of feeding behavior for the efficient culture of salmonid fishes. The World Aquaculture Society, Halifax, Nova Scotia, pp. 13–20.

Olla B L, Davis M W, Ryer C H. 1992. Foraging and predator avoidance in hatchery-reared Pacific salmon: achievement of behavioral potential. In: Thorpe J E, Huntingford F A eds. World Aquaculture Workshops. The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, LA, pp. 5–12.

Ryer C H. Olla B L. 1991. Information transfer and the facilitation and inhibition of feeding in a schooling fish. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 30: 317–323.

Sànchez-Vàzquez F J, Tabata M. 1998. Circadian rhythms of demand-feeding and locomotor activity in rainbow trout. Journal of Fish Biology, 52: 255–267.

Sveier H, Lied E. 1998. The effect of feeding regime on growth, feed utilisation and weight dispersion in large Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reared in seawater. Aquaculture, 165: 333–345.

Thorpe J E, Talbot C, Miles M S, Rawling C, Keay D S. 1990. Food consumption in 24 hours by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in a sea cage. Aquaculture, 90: 41–47.

Tipping J M. 2001. Adult returns of hatchery sea-run cutthroat trout fed by hand versus demand feeders. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 63: 134–136.

Vijayan M M, Leatherland J F. 1988. Effects of stocking density on the growth and stress response in brook char, Salvelinus fontinalis. Aquaculture, 75: 159–170.

浏览量

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

The in vitro effects of steroids, human chorionic gonadotropin and cyanoketone on germinal vesicle breakdown of striped mullet (Mugil cephalus L.) oocytes

Annual changes in plasma levels of cortisol and sex steroid hormones in male rainbow trout,Oncorhynchus mykiss

Effects of irradiated Ergosan on the growth performance and mucus biological components of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

Effects of varying densities on serum reproductive parameters in pen-reared juvenile female rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss farms

大涵道比风扇/增压级进气畸变数值模拟研究