Substrate selection and seasonal variation in abundance and size composition of isopod Lirceus fontinalis in Ontario streams, Canada[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2007,25(2):215-220.
Zhao, X., Fox, M.G., Lasenby, D.C. et al. Substrate selection and seasonal variation in abundance and size composition of isopod Lirceus fontinalis in Ontario streams, Canada., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 25, 215–220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-007-0215-5
Substrate selection and seasonal variation in abundance and size composition of isopod Lirceus fontinalis in Ontario streams, Canada[J]. 海洋湖沼学报(英文), 2007,25(2):215-220. DOI: 10.1007/s00343-007-0215-5.
Zhao, X., Fox, M.G., Lasenby, D.C. et al. Substrate selection and seasonal variation in abundance and size composition of isopod Lirceus fontinalis in Ontario streams, Canada., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 25, 215–220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-007-0215-5DOI:
Substrate selection and seasonal variation in abundance and size composition of isopod Lirceus fontinalis in Ontario streams, Canada
摘要
Abstract
The abundance and size composition of stream isopods Lirceus fontinalis were investigated from April 2001 to August 2002 in 3 streams in southern Ontario
Canada. Effects of current speed was released from the analysis by choosing slow flowing water. The effects of substrate
season and water depth on the abundance
distribution and size composition of the isopods were analyzed. It was found that substrate and season influence isopods the most. The rocky substrate with attached filamentous macro-algae contains an isopod abundance 7.05 times that of bare rock substrate and 14.6 times that of fine-sand and mud substrate. There was a large variation with respect to seasonality in both abundance and size composition of the isopods
with the highest abundance occurring in summer and the lowest in winter and spring; individual isopods also tend to be larger in the winter and spring. In all substrates
shallow areas tend to support higher densities of isopods than deeper areas.
关键词
Keywords
references
Adams, J., P. Greenwood, R. Pollit and T. Yonow, 1985. Loading constraints and sexual size distribution in Asellus aquaticus. Behaviour 92: 277–287.
Arunachalam, M., K. C. Madhusoodanan Nair, J. Vijverberg, K. Kortmulder and H. Suriyanarayanan, 1991. Substrate selection and seasonal variation in densities of invertebrates in stream pools of a tropical river. Hydrobiologia 213: 141–148.
Bostrom, C. and J. Mattila, 1999. The relative importance of food and shelter for seagrass-associated invertebrates: a latitudinal comparison of habitat choice by isopod grazers. Oecologia 120: 162–170.
Cuffney, T. F., J. B. Wallace and J. R. Webster, 1984. Pesticide manipulation of a headwater stream: Invertebrate responses and their significance for ecosystem processes. Freshwat. Invertebr. Biol. 3: 153–171.
Drake, J. A., 1984. Species aggregation: the influence of detritus in a benthic invertebrate community. Hydrobiogia 112: 109–115.
Findlay, S., J. L. Meyer and P. J. Smith, 1986. Contribution of fungal biomass to the diet of a freshwater isopod (Lirceus sp.). Freshwater Biology 16: 377–385.
Heer, L. M., 1974. Comparative Life History of Lirceus Fontinails Rafinesque (Isopoda, Asellota) in two Limestone Creeks near Lexington, Kentucky. MS Thesis, University of Kentucky.
Holomuzki, J. R. and T. M. Short, 1988. Habitat use and fish avoidance behaviors by the stream-dwelling isopods Lirceus fontinails. Oikos 52: 79–86.
Huang, C. and A. Sih, 1990. Experimental studies on behaviourally mediated, indirect interactions through a shared predator. Ecology 71: 1 515–1 522.
Hultin, L, 1971. Upstream movements of Gammarus pulex (Amphhipoda) in a south Swedish stream. Oikos 22: 329–347.
Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. Univ. of Toronto Press, Canada.
Matthaei, C. D. and C. R. Townsend. 2000. Long-term effects of local disturbance history on mobile stream invertebrates. Oecologia 125: 119–126.
Minshall, G. W. and J. N. Minshall, 1977. Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a rocky mountain (U.S.A) stream. Hydrobiologia 55: 231–249.
Pavia, H., H. Carr and P. Aberg, 1999. Habitat and feeding preferences of crustacean mesoherbivores inhabiting the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. and its epiphytic macroalgae. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 236: 15–22.
Pennak, R. W., 1989. Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States. Wiley, New York.
Rabeni, C. F. and G. W. Minshall, 1977. Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos 29: 33–43.
Reice, S. R., 1980. The role of substratum in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream. Ecology 6: 580–590.
Soluk, D. A. and H. F. Clifford, 1985. Microhabitat shift and substrate selection by the psammophilous predator Pseudiron centralis McDunnough (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Can. J. Zool. 63: 1 539–1 543.
Sparkes, T. C., 1996. Effects of predation on population variation in adult size in a stream-dwelling isopod. Oecologia 106: 85–92.
Styron, C. E., 1969. Taxonomy of two populations of an aquatic isopod Lirceus fontinails Raf. Am. Midl. Nat. 82: 402–416.
Ulfstrand, S., 1967. Microdistribution of benthic species (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Diptera: Simuliidae) in Lapland streams. Oikos 18: 293–310.
William, D. D. and N. E. William, 1993. The upstream/downstream movement paradox of lotic invertebrates: quantitative evidence from a Welsh mountain stream. Freshwater Biology 30: 199–218.
Zhao, X., G. M. Fox and D. C. Lasenby, 2006. Effect of prey density, prey mobility and habitat structure on size selection and consumption of amphipods by a benthic feeding fish. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 165: 269–288.
The trial reading is over, you can activate your VIP account to continue reading.