Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton

Yang Yu-feng; Zdeněk Brandl

doi:10.1007/BF02850535

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton

OriginalPaper | Updated：2023-05-16

- Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton
- Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton
- 海洋湖沼学报（英文） 1996年14卷第1期页码：17-26
- Affiliations：
  
  1. Institute of Hydrobiology
  2. Hydrobiological Institute Czech Academy of Sciences
- Author bio：
- Funds：
- DOI：10.1007/BF02850535
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：1996
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton[J]. 海洋湖沼学报（英文）, 1996,14(1):17-26.

Yu-feng, Y., Brandl, Z. Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 14, 17–26 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850535
Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton[J]. 海洋湖沼学报（英文）, 1996,14(1):17-26. DOI： 10.1007/BF02850535.

Yu-feng, Y., Brandl, Z. Feeding ofAcanthocylops robustus on zooplankton., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 14, 17–26 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850535 DOI：

摘要

Abstract

Feeding of freshwater cyclopoid copepodAcanthocyclops robustus on zooplankton was examined by a senes of feeding experiments during August–September of 1993. Study results showedA. robustus can capture and eat all type items provided from the Starý Haklovský fishpond

a shallow eutrophic water body near Budějovice City

Czech Republic. Selection by the predator was determined largely by prey body-size and density

but was also affected by prey types. Variable but significant changes in feeding rates were found in various size distribution and concentration of prey types. Percentages of small (80–235μm) and large (445–610μm) prey consumed were 42.47 and 3.85%

respectively. Starvation did not cause statistically significant difference. The feeding onCeriodaphnia quadrangula showed significant difference between large and small prey. Feeding rate increased with increasing prey concentration.

关键词

Keywords

references

Anderson, R. S., 1970. Predator-prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some Lakes in Western Canada.Can. J. Zool. 48: 1229–1240.

Brandl, Z. Fernando, C. H., 1974. Feeding of the copepodAcanthocylops vernalis on the cladoceranCeriodaphnia reticulata under laboratory conditions.Can. J. Zool. 52: 99–105.

Brandl, Z., Fernando, C. H., 1975. Investigations on the feeding of carnivorous cyclopoids.Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 19: 2959–2965.

Brandl, Z., Fernando, C. H., 1978. Prey selection by the cyclopoid copepodsMesocyclops edax andCyclops vicinus.Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 20: 2502–2510.

Brandl, Z., Fernando, C. H., 1981. The impact of predation by cyclopoid copepods on zooplankton.Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 21: 1573–1577.

Brandl, Z., Fernando, C. H., 1986. Feeding and food consumption byMesocyclops edax.Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Copepoda 1984, Ottawa. Nat. Mus Canada Syll. 58: 254–258.

Brooks, J. I., Dodson, S. I., 1965. Predation, body size and competition of plankton.Science 150: 28–35.

Dodson, S. I., 1974. Zooplankton competition and predation: An experimental test of the size-efficiency hypothesis.Ecology 55: 605–613.

Dodson, S. I., Edwards, C., Wemin, F. et al., 1976. Zooplankton: Specific distribution and food abundance.Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 309–313.

Downing, J. A., Rigler, F. H., 1984. A Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters. Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 336–412.

Dziuban, N. A., 1937. On the nutrition of some cyclopidae (Crustacea).Comptes Rendus (Doklady) de I Academie des Sciences de I URSS. 17: 319–322.

Fryer, G., 1957a. The food of some freshwater cyclopoid copepods and its ecological significance.J. Anim. Ecol. 26: 263–286.

Fryer, G., 1957b. The feeding mechanism of some freshwater cyclopoid copepods.Proc. Zool. Soc. London. 129: 1–25.

Hall, D. J., Threlkeld, S. T., Burns, C. W. et al., 1976. The size structure of zooplankton communities.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 177–208.

Karabin, A., 1978. The pressure of pelagic predators of the genus.Mesocyclops (Copepoda, Crustacea) on small zooplankton.Ekologia polska. 26(2): 241–257.

Kerfoot, W. C., 1978. Combat between predatory copepods and their prey:Cyclops. Epischura andBosmina.Limnol. Oceangr. 23(6): 1089–1102.

Krylov, P. I. 1988. Predation of the freshwater cyclopoid copepodMegacyclops gigas on lake zooplankton: functional response and prey selection.Arch. Hydrobiol. 113(2): 231–250.

Lam, R. K., Frost, B. W., 1976. Model of copepod filtering response to changes in size and concentration of food.Limnol. Oceanogr. 21(4): 490–500.

Landry, M. Y., Lehner-Fournier, J. M., Fangerness, V. L., 1985. Predatory feeding behavior of the marine cyclopoid copepodCorycaeus anglicus.Marine Biology 85: 163–169.

Li, J. L., Li, H. W., 1979. Species-specific factors affecting predator-prey interactions of the copepodAcanthocyclops vernalis with its natural prey.Limnol. Oceangor. 24(4): 613–626.

McQueen, J. D., 1969. Reduction of zooplankton standing stocks by predaceousCyclops bicuspidatus thomasi in Marion Lake, British Columbia.J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 26: 1605–1618.

Paninska, K., 1985. Carnivorous and detritivorous feeding of Mesocyclopsleuckarti Claus (Cyclopoida, Copepoda).Hydrobiologia 120: 249–257.

Roche, K. F., 1987. Post-encounter Vulnerability of some rotifer prey types to predation by the copepodAcanthocyclops robustus.Hydrobiologia 147: 229–233.

Roche, K. F., 1990. Prey features affecting ingestion rates byAcanthocyclops robustus (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) on zooplankto.Oecologia 83: 76–82.

Smyly, W. J. P., 1970. Observation on rate of development, longevity and fecundity ofAcanthocyclops viridis (Jurine) (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) in relation to type of prey.Crustaceana 18(1): 21–35.

Stemberger, R. S., 1985. Prey selection by the copepodDiacyclops thomasi.Oecologia (Berlin) 65: 492–497.

Stemberger, R. S., 1986. The effects of food deprivation. prey density and volume on clearance rates and ingestion rates ofDiacyclops thomasi.Journal of Plankton Research 8(1): 243–251.

Stemberger, R. S., Evans, M. S., 1984. Rotifer seasonal succession and copepod predation in Lake Michigan.J. Great Lakes. Res. 10(4): 417–428.

Williamson, C. E., 1980. The predatory behavior ofMesocyclops edaxi predator preferences, prey defenses and starvation-induced changes.Limnol. Oceanogr. 25(5): 903–909.

Williamson, C. E., 1981. Foraging behavior of a freshwater copepod: Frequency changes in looping behavior at high and low prey densities.Oecologia (Berl). 50: 332–336.

Williamson, C. E., 1983. Behavioral interactions between a cyclopoid copepod pedator and its prey.Journal of plankton Research. 5(5): 701–711.

Wilson, D. S., 1973. Food size selection among copepods.Ecology 54(4): 909–914.

浏览量

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

Environmental stability via sexual reproduction of cyclical parthenogenetic rotifers affects offspring’s population performances: maternal effects on population dynamics

Responding of zooplankton to environmental factor changes in the Changjiang River estuarine regions in spring-summer from 2016 to 2020

The response of zooplankton abundance in saline meromictic Lake Shira to a change in circulation regime

Effects of shellfish culture on the community and mortality of zooplankton in a subtropical Bay

Functional groups and seasonal diversity of crustacean zooplankton in adjacent waters of Haizhou Bay, South Yellow Sea