Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry for quick detection of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental water samples
|Updated:2023-05-16
|
Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry for quick detection of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental water samples
Journal of Oceanology and LimnologyVol. 35, Issue 1, Pages: 185-191(2017)
Affiliations:
1. Marine Ecology Center First Institute of Oceanography State Oceanic Administration
2. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Ocean University of China
3. Qingdao Hao Ao Environmental Engineering Ltd.
4. Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology Ministry of Education Ocean University of China
5. Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology Ocean University of China
Sun, C., Jiang, F., Gao, W. et al. Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry for quick detection of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental water samples., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 35, 185–191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-016-5175-1
DOI:
Sun, C., Jiang, F., Gao, W. et al. Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry for quick detection of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental water samples., Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 35, 185–191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-016-5175-1DOI:
Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry for quick detection of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental water samples
摘要
Abstract
Detection of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria has largely been dependent on targeted gene sequencing technology or traditional cell cultivation
which usually takes from days to months to carry out. This clearly does not meet the requirements of analysis for time-sensitive samples and/or complicated environmental samples. Since energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) can be used to simultaneously detect multiple elements in a sample
including sulfur
with minimal sample treatment
this technology was applied to detect sulfur-oxidizing bacteria using their high sulfur content within the cell. This article describes the application of scanning electron microscopy imaging coupled with EDS mapping for quick detection of sulfur oxidizers in contaminated environmental water samples
with minimal sample handling. Scanning electron microscopy imaging revealed the existence of dense granules within the bacterial cells
while EDS identified large amounts of sulfur within them. EDS mapping localized the sulfur to these granules. Subsequent 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that the bacteria detected in our samples belonged to the genus Chromatium
which are sulfur oxidizers. Thus
EDS mapping made it possible to identify sulfur oxidizers in environmental samples based on localized sulfur within their cells
within a short time (within 24 h of sampling). This technique has wide ranging applications for detection of sulfur bacteria in environmental water samples.
关键词
Keywords
references
Amann R I, Ludwig W, Schleifer K H. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev., 59(1): 143–169.
Eder S H K, Gigler A M, Hanzlik M, Winklhofer M. 2014. Sub-micrometer-scale mapping of magnetite crystals and sulfur globules in magnetotactic bacteria using confocal raman micro-spectrometry. PLoS One, 9(9): e107356, http://dx.dox.org./10.1371/journal.pone.0107356.
Fischer C, Wiggli M, Schanz F, Hanselmann K W, Bachofen R. 1996. Light environment and synthesis of bacteriochlorophyll by populations of Chromatium okenii under natural environmental conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 21(1): 1–9.
Franz B, Lichtenberg H, Hormes J, Modrow H, Dahl C, Prange A. 2007. Utilization of solid ‘elemental’ sulfur by the phototrophic purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum: a sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Microbiol ogy, 153(4): 1268–1274.
Gervais F. 1997. Diel vertical migration of Cryptomona s and Chromatium in the deep chlorophyll maximum of a eutrophic lake. J. Plankton Res., 19(5): 533–550.
Hageage G J, Gherna R L. 1971. Surface structure of Chromatium okenii and Chromatium weissei. J. Bacteriol., 106(2): 687–690.
Jogler C, Niebler M, Lin W, Kube M, Wanner G, Kolinko S, Stief P, Beck A J, de Beer D, Petersen N, Pan Y, Amann R, Reinhardt R, Schüler D. 2010. Cultivation-independent characterization of ‘Candidatus Magnetobacterium bavaricum’ via ultrastructural, geochemical, ecological and metagenomic methods. Environ. Microbiol., 12(9): 2466–2478, http://dx.dox.org./10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010. 02220.x.
Keim C N, Solórzano G, Farina M, Lins U. 2005. Intracellular inclusions of uncultured magnetotactic bacteria. Int. Microbiol., 8(2): 111–117.
Maki J S. 2013. Bacterial intracellular sulfur globules: structure and function. J. Mol. Microb iol. Biotech nol., 23 (4-5): 270–280.
Marshall K T, Morris R M. 2013. Isolation of an aerobic sulfur oxidizer from the SUP05/Arctic96BD-19 clade. ISME J., 7(2): 452–455.
Mori Y, Purdy K J, Oakley B B, Kondo R. 2010. Comprehensive detection of phototrophic sulfur bacteria using PCR primers that target reverse dissimilatory sulfite reductase gene. Microbes Environ., 25(3): 190–196.
Oren A, Mana L, Jehlicka J. 2015. Probing single cells of purple sulfur bacteria with Raman spectroscopy: carotenoids and elemental sulfur. FEMS Microbi o l. Lett., 362 (6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv021.
Pfennig N, Trüper H G. 1992. The family Chromatiaceae. In: Balows A, Trüper H G, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer K H eds. The Prokaryotes, A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification, Applications. 2 nd edn. Springer, New York. p.3200–3221.
Pjevac P, Korlevic M, Berg J S, Bura-Nakic E, Ciglenecki I, Amann R, Orlic S. 2015. Community shift from phototrophic to chemotrophic sulfide oxidation following anoxic holomixis in a stratified seawater lake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 81(1): 298–308.
Prange A, Chauvistré R, Modrow H, Hormes J, Trüper H G, Dahl C. 2002. Quantitative speciation of sulfur in bacterial sulfur globules: X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals at least three different species of sulfur. Microbiol ogy, 148(1): 267–276.
Rabus R, Hansen T A, Widdel F. 2013. Dissimilatory sulfateand sulfur-reducing prokaryotes. In: Rosenbrug E, De Long E F, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F eds. Prokaryotes Prokaryotic Physiology and Biochemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. p.309–404.
Segura-Noguera M, Blasco D, Fortuño J M. 2012. An Improved energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis method for analyzing simultaneously carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, sulfur, and other cation and anion concentrations in single natural marine microplankton cells. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 10(9): 666–680.
Zhao J Y, Fu Y N, Zhao C G, Yang S P, Qu Y B, Jiao N Z. 2011. Identification and characterization of a purple sulfur bacterium from mangrove with rhodopin as predominant carotenoid. Acta Microbiol ogical Sin ica, 51(10): 1318–1325. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhong F, Wu J, Dai Y R, Yang L H, Zhang Z H, Cheng S P, Zhang Q. 2015. Bacterial community analysis by PCRDGGE and 454-pyrosequencing of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands with front aeration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 99(3): 1499–1512.
The trial reading is over, you can activate your VIP account to continue reading.